• [stock-market-ticker symbols="AAPL;MSFT;GOOG;HPQ;^SPX;^DJI;LSE:BAG" stockExchange="NYSENasdaq" width"100%" palette="financial-light"]

    JUDGE TAKES TIME TO REVIEW MOTIONS TO DISMISS...Fulton County Attorneys Tried To Claim Sovereign Immunity In GA Election Fraud Case In Motion To Dismiss

    June 21, 2021
    3 Comments
    Judge Amero, Henry County

    Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gab TV

    UPDATE 1125 EST - JUDGE TAKES TIME TO REVIEW MOTIONS TO DISMISS...NO FURTHER DISCOVERY UNTIL RULING ISSUED

    UPDATE 1115 EST - State SoS office says everything has been investigated, and we're still investigating, and 'trust us'.

    UPDATE 1050 EST - court has reconvened after technical difficulties


    1040 PM EST - Video Feed Crashes Before Judgement Revealed

    These aren't the droids you're looking for...

    CDMedia will update this situation as soon as more information revealed.

    LIVESTREAM FEED HERE

    Fulton County attempted to declare sovereign immunity in front of Judge Amero, Henry County, GA, in the election fraud case where petitioners are attempting to scan 147k mail-in ballots for massive fraud that occurred in the Nov 3rd U.S. general election.

    Legal analysts commented the Fulton County attorneys are trying to claim this is an election contest and therefore no one can sue, possibly trying to set up an argument for appeal.

    The argument from Fulton County, with newly-hired high-paid criminal defense attorneys, shows desperation and a realization the audit is for real, and the fraud may very well be revealed, hence multiple motions to dismiss.

    Attorneys for the petitioners rebutted that it is shocking to hear an argument in a court of law in the United States of America that the Constitution of the U.S. has no jurisdiction here and citizens have no right to due process.

    One legal analyst commented, "On the sovereign immunity point yes, the "good old boy" (hereinafter "GOB") judges, in trying to be "textualists" and "originalists" expanded sovereign immunity in Georgia a couple of years ago. The people of Georgia changed that ruling with a Constitutional amendment that was approved last year and is effective January 1. But the amendment had to be approved by the GOB Legislature, so they provided that the state agencies could not be sued for money, only injunctive relief, to cause them to do what they needed to do.

    "The Supreme Court of Georgia completely misread the history of sovereign immunity. The King was sovereign, but that did not mean that his ministers were not subject to suit if they violated the laws of Parliament.

    "This is not about the law anymore. It is about protecting the bureaucracy."

    Judge Amero responded with questions on the nature of the possible counterfeit documents, and being possibly generated by a printer.

    You Won't Get Anywhere Else What You Get From CDMedia! Donate! 

    SHARE THIS ARTICLE

    Author

    CDM Staff

    The mission at Creative Destruction Media is to be the catalyst for the "process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one."
  • Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    3 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Steve

    Me thinks they doth protest too much.

    D3F1ANT

    No matter how much more proof is uncovered, nothing will happen to these criminals. They stole the election and they're going to get away with it.

    sjp

    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation." Thomas Jefferson.
    In a 1787 letter to William Stephens Smith, the son-in-law of John Adams.

    "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness." Declaration of Independence

    The United States Declaration of Independence is the pronouncement adopted by the Second Continental Congress meeting in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on July 4, 1776

    FOLLOW US

  • Subscribe to our evening newsletter to stay informed during these challenging times!!

    ×