• The Virtue Of Neutrality: Resist Pressure To Choose Sides In The Ukraine-Russia Crisis

    March 15, 2022
    Ukraine SitRep From Both Sides - Day 15

    Please Follow us on GabMindsTelegramRumbleGab TVGETTR

    Reprinted with permission Mises Institute Alice Salles

    Nonintervention is more than just a good US foreign policy prescription. When it comes to the Russia-Ukraine War, American neutrality is patriotic. Resistance to the narrative pushers is essential for the formation of authentic community and freedom. 

    The way the media covers it, the Russia-Ukraine conflict hardly seems like a proxy war. How is it that tens of millions of Americans have seemingly internalized these overseas events in the same way so many did with the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq two decades ago?

    Cultural landmarks lit up in the colors of the flag now drape over social media avatars. That’s the Ukrainian flag, of course, not the American one. 

    But anyone not flying the colors of the day risks being trashed not only by the powerful but by their own countrymen. Tulsi Gabbard was called a traitor for wishing the war had been avoided in the first place! Tucker Carlson is once again the target of a cancellation mob.

    “Anyone even slightly off-key or questioning of that script is hunted down and held up as a heretic and traitor,” Glenn Greenwald wrote recently. 

    Nobody should be surprised by this development. It’s a continuation—no, an escalation of the whole covid scamdemic. Whatever the concocted crisis of the day is, if you do not acknowledge it as real or if you challenge the grand orthodoxy, then you’ll be labeled a fake news peddler, a hater, an extremist, a domestic terrorist, or worse.

    Crises grow government power. That’s how it’s always been. The myriad of ways that war brings “the many under the dominion of the few,” as James Madison said, are still here and are not going away any time soon.

    What defines our present condition is how the moral panics are used to rally a civilian army that revels in the demise of the nonconforming opposition.

    A war provides the needed cohesion, and no American even needs to be directly involved in the bloodshed. The Russia-Ukraine War is an easy lightning rod that the government and established centers of power in society can use to demonize Americans who hold the wrong view. 

    Despite the strong opinions on either side, Americans don’t really get a say in foreign policy. The 2016 presidential election was the first time in a long time that there was such a meaningful gap between the candidates on the issue, at least rhetorically. In 2020, the foreign policy debate between President Donald Trump and candidate Joe Biden was canceled.

    The question persists: What is it about this Russia-Ukraine war that animates Americans so much? Solid majorities of Republican and Democrat voters support a US-enforced no-fly zone over Ukraine. That would mean the US at war with Russia.

    The answer for why Americans pine for more war is probably complicated, but it’s clear that they generally hold simplistic views of the situation over there. People poked fun at Vice President Kamala Harris for summing up the recent events as a “bigger country” invading “a smaller country” and adding, “Basically, that’s wrong.” But the intended audience probably appreciated her analysis.

    The more sophisticated cases for no-fly zones and US sanctions sound the same except that they evoke a more emotional response. It’s a fight for democracy. It’s for freedom. The US must stand up against bullies and hate. These vapid buzzwords do the trick.

    In 1953, Robert Nisbet wrote in his book Quest for Community that “the power of war to create a sense of moral meaning is one of the most frightening aspects of the twentieth century.”

    That’s continued into the twenty-first century unabated. For over two years now, covid has shown all of us in a personal way the “deep moral compulsion of war” that Nisbet talked about. Citizens policed each other, or at least some policed others, in the War to Flatten the Curve. People wished for the deaths of those who didn’t follow the Fauci line, usually on social media but sometimes in public, unknowingly on camera.

    Chris Hedges wrote of a similar phenomenon in his 2002 book titled War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning. So why is our society so desperate for meaning that it laps the establishment spoon? Obviously, something deep is missing in the social structures that tie a nation together. 

    That explains the unwillingness to take off the masks postmandate. To the wearers, they display status, a sense of belonging to a community. The same goes for other performative acts across the political spectrum. It feels good to believe you’ll be seen as living up to some greater calling, lofty goal, or common good.

    It is harrowing to think of where this trend ends as we near the precipice of World War III or nuclear war. H.L. Mencken once wrote that “to wage a war for a purely moral reason is as absurd as to ravish a woman for a purely moral reason.”

    It’s upon patriotic Americans to champion neutrality. But it won’t be enough to say it’s the best path to peace or prosperity, although that’s true. The case must be made locally, where real meaning can be found in serving our families and communities.

    Only at the small scale, in solidarity with other localities, can we revive an authentic antiwar culture that neutralizes the state’s propaganda.Author:

    Alice Salles

    Alice Salles was born and raised in Brazil but has lived in America for over ten years. She now lives in Fort Wayne, Indiana, with her husband, Nick Hankoff, and their four children.  

    CDMedia is being targeted and obviously too effective! We need your support to put more reporters in the field! Help us here!  


    CDM Staff

    The mission at Creative Destruction Media is to be the catalyst for the "process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one."
  • Subscribe
    Notify of

    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    A A Ron

    Fakebook, Tw@tter, Tictard are all cancer anyways. Why are you even still on them.
    Do yourself a favor, do your mental health a favor and just avoid those things like the plague upon intelligence that they are.


    Indeed, why so many persons do not resist. Someone tells them from long time that its in fashion to look far away, abstract, to the abstract notion of 'the world's people"which are, in fact, just a generality and so the simplest and empty notion, the familis and communities appear too complicated.


    There were two great world wars, although the American Civil War took place on the world stage with Confederates attacking and wrecking the New England Whaling Fleet in the Northern Pacific, which actually probably saved the whales from extinction, however the wars and ideologies s pread to involve you whether you intend to be neutral or not.
    The US was neutral prior to WWI and was drawn into the war through unrestricted submarine warfare involving America no, then the US was neutral again, Roosevelt being re-elected on a platform of keeping America out of the war. That ended with Roosevelt authorizing the American Volunteer Group operating on the Chinese side and the Japanese fulfilling their pledge to attack the US if the Americans intervened, with t.he attack on Pearl Harbor, a surprise attack tactically, but likely not strategically, and carriers were at sea rather than vulnerable in the harbor, although MacArthur totally failed in a defense of the Philippines, despite actual warnings from the Pearl Harbor attack. Then again wars in Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait, Iraq and Syria.
    Can America and NATO as well as countries in the Far East remain neutral when there is open warfare on their doorstep.
    Putin has been intruding on adjoining countries for almost twenty years, the Russo/Georgia war, the Crimea take over by “little green men”, the soldiers on furlough involved in Donbas, as well as frequent cross border shelling.
    Russian propaganda says Russia and Putin aren’t involved.
    There is also the involvement of Russia in Syria, although with Obama’s and Kerry’s endorsement following the Obama red line of chemical weapons deployment, and the failure of America to respond despite the “red line” being crossed.
    All this time, Russia has been updating and modernizing its. Nuclear weapons inventory and developing hypersonic weapons as we all as dramatic updating of its air and space defense capabilities while America has an aging Minuteman III defense or deterrent based on 50 year old missiles and and antiquated computer control system in some respects, for which computer components are no longer available.
    Meanwhile, Putin has concentrated his power and authority in Russia, so he has s insular authority to carry out war.
    The rest of the world, besides the Western Powers and Japan are not sanctioning Russia, countries such as India and China, while Saudi Arabia is negotiating with China to accept Chinese currency, (yuan), rather than dollars for oil.
    The US, the former Arsenal of democracy is restricting rather than going all out in petroleum and gas production.
    Will neutrality play out, especially since America has been supplying Javelin h(anti-armor) and Stinger (shoulder fired manpad, anti-aircraft) missiles to Ukraine in quantity, as well as other NATO countries supplying large quantities of similar weapons.
    If Russia takes over Ukraine, it will own and control a dominant quantity of the world’s food supply, as well as a dominant quantity of the world’s energy it already controls.
    Can we remain neutral in the face of a threat or risk to a dominant quantity of the world’s food supply as well as dominant energy supply, along with that country (Putin), having authority in use of the world’s dominant nuclear Arsenal in ICBM’s, silent “black hole” submarines and air launched hypersonic missile capability?
    The Bucharest agreement signed by Russia, UK, USA and Ukraine is a guarantee the US will defend Ukraine’s sovereignty in return for its giving up nuclear weapons, so there is already an agreement between US and Ukrain, which means the US isn’t neutral to begin with. Neutrality should have been declared during the Clinton administration when the guarantee agreement was signed by the USA.
    We’re already deeply involved, and declaring neutrality now would essentially involve surrender.


    Weird how many conservative websites are doing their best to make Putin's day for him. Really twisted logic, making every excuse for him.

  • Subscribe to our evening newsletter to stay informed during these challenging times!!