• [stock-market-ticker symbols="AAPL;MSFT;GOOG;HPQ;^SPX;^DJI;LSE:BAG" stockExchange="NYSENasdaq" width"100%" palette="financial-light"]

    Booze Or Big Ag: What’s Behind Iowa’s Cancer Crisis?

    March 16, 2024
    3 Comments

    A new report blaming Iowa’s alarming cancer rates on alcohol consumption drew from experts who argue that the state’s “unrivaled” use of pesticides, fertilizers and animal manure in its massive agricultural industry is the more likely culprit.

    Booze Or Big Ag: What’s Behind Iowa’s Cancer Crisis?

    Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, GETTR, Truth Social, Twitter 

    By The New Lede

    By Keith Schneider

    Amid increasing scrutiny of a potential link between Iowa farm chemicals and cancer, a new report is generating controversy as it blames rising cancer rates not on the toxins used widely throughout the state, but on something else entirely: binge alcohol consumption.

    The Iowa Cancer Registry, a health research group housed at the University of Iowa, reported on Feb. 20 that Iowa has the second-highest and fastest-rising incidence of cancer among all states.

    An estimated 21,000 new cancer cases are expected to develop this year and 6,100 Iowans will die from cancer, Iowa Cancer Registry Director Mary Charlton said in announcing the new report.

    Iowa, she said, has the highest rate of binge drinking in the Midwest with 22% of residents reporting binge drinking, more than the national average of 17%. Overall, Iowa has the fourth highest incidence of alcohol-related cancers in the U.S., according to the report.

    “Alcohol is a known carcinogen and a risk factor for several cancers including oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, esophagus, rectum, liver, and female breast cancers,” Charlton said in a news conference.

    The assessment has drawn questions and sparked doubts, however, from state leaders and health and environment researchers who have been calling for a probe into just how much the state’s agricultural industry may be contributing to the spread of disease.

    “Is alcohol responsible for the increase in cancer incidence here since 2014? I personally doubt that,” said James Merchant, a retired professor of occupational and environmental health, and former dean of the University of Iowa College of Public Health.

    “What needs to be looked at are things that are probable or possible carcinogens that have increased beginning about 1990, because of the well-recognized latency of environmental cancers,” Merchant said.

    Merchant continued:

    “Those carcinogens associated with industrial agriculture are the ones that really need to be looked at very closely.”

    Pesticides and fertilizers

    Iowa is the leading U.S. corn and soybean growing state, with millions of acres devoted to the crops. Corn and soybean farmers typically make heavy use of pesticides and fertilizers on their fields.

    Iowa farms use more weedkillers (237 million pounds) and apply more commercial fertilizer (11.6 billion pounds) every year than any other state, according to state and federal data.

    The chemicals are known to contaminate both soil and water and leave pesticide residue in the harvested grains.

    Researchers have long suspected that exposure to a number of the most popular pesticides, particularly glyphosate (the active ingredient in the Roundup brand of herbicide), may cause human cancers.

    In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic” to humans.

    Other studies have found that exposure to other common pesticides is associated with cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leukemia, brain and prostate cancer.

    Iowa’s sprawling livestock and poultry sector is also a concern. The Iowa operations produce more animal manure (54.5 million tons) every year than any other state, according to federal and state data.

    Since 1992, for instance, the state’s hog population has grown to 24 million hogs, up more than 70%. Iowa’s manure production in total has increased almost 80% since 2002, according to the latest USDA Census of Agriculture.

    The manure from the animals contributes to the creation of nitrates, which form when nitrogen from fertilizer and manure combine with oxygen. The waste streams routinely drain from farm fields into groundwater, streams and rivers, contaminating water sources.

    Babies can suffer severe health problems when consuming nitrates in drinking water, and a growing body of literature indicates potential associations that include an increased risk of cancer.

    Exposure to elevated levels of nitrates in drinking water from commercial fertilizer and manure has been linked by numerous researchers to cancers of the blood, brain, breast, bladder and ovaries.

    David Cwiertny, professor of civil and environmental engineering and director of the Center for Health Effects of Environmental Contamination at the University of Iowa, recently started working with the Cancer Registry to explore potential environmental factors contributing to Iowa’s cancer rates.

    He noted that multiple risk factors could be contributing to the problem in Iowa, including nitrate exposure. Research studies show that’s especially the case with colorectal cancer — ranked No. 8 in incidence among all states — and breast cancer, ranked No. 9.

    “We’re unique in terms of our production system here. Unrivaled anywhere in the world, right?” said Cwiertny. “We’re proud to boast about that. But we shouldn’t be so foolish as to think that the unrivaled scale of production doesn’t come with very unique consequences or challenges for our state, right?”

    The new registry findings focusing on alcohol consumption and not agricultural chemicals come as public interest in cancer has swelled across the Corn Belt.

    Legislation to invest more state funds in research that identifies environmental sources of cancer has been introduced in Iowa, as well as Nebraska.

    In Minnesota, legislators are proposing to introduce a sales tax on commercial fertilizer to pay for closing drinking wells contaminated with nitrates and supplying thousands of southeast Minnesota residents with clean sources of water.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ordered Minnesota to halt nitrate contamination in groundwater in November 2023.

    Drinking and disease

    Alcohol consumption is a known risk factor for certain cancers. Nearly 4% of cancers diagnosed worldwide in 2020 can be attributed to alcohol consumption, according to the World Health Organization.

    In the U.S. alone, about 75,000 cancer cases and 19,000 cancer deaths are estimated to be linked to alcohol each year. Alcoholic drinks contain ethanol, which is a known carcinogen, according to the National Cancer Institute.

    And yet, linking alcohol to rising cancer rates in Iowa seems questionable given some of the data points. Iowa’s per capita consumption of alcohol ranked No. 24 in the nation, according to Statista, a data research service.

    Drinking habits in Iowa do not appear to have changed dramatically in the last few decades. Though about a fifth of those who drink alcohol in Iowa identify as binge drinkers — five drinks at a sitting for men, four for women — Iowa’s binge drinkers don’t appear to be drinking more heavily now than years ago.

    On average, Iowa’s binge drinkers consumed 586 drinks a year in 2017, the latest year for data, six more than in 2011. Iowa was one of the 39 states where binge drinking “did not change significantly during that period,” according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    Nationally, rates of alcohol consumption and cancer have diverged. Per capita consumption of alcohol in the U.S. increased to 2.51 gallons annually in 2021, 17% more than in 1999, according to federal figures. But the national rate of cancer incidence declined 16% during that period, according to the CDC.

    Iowa’s increase in cancer incidence appears to have started around 2012, according to the CDC and the Iowa Cancer Registry. That rise in incidence occurred about 20 years — the scientifically accepted cancer latency period — after the start of Iowa’s rapid industrialization in farming.

    “Having a high cancer rate doesn’t immediately translate to its being caused by industrial agriculture. Although I think there is just a strong reason to look very hard in that direction,” said Merchant.

    Merchant continued:

    “They want to be very, very sure of the ground they stand on given the power politics in this state. Everybody understands that. My view is that shouldn’t keep you from asking the question. And those questions need to be asked.”

    A ‘cancer crisis’

    Public confirmation last year of Iowa’s high cancer incidence also converged with what most adult Iowans already knew in private. Cancer is everywhere in Iowa. Among the 25 counties in the U.S. with the highest incidence of cancer, Iowa’s Palo Alto County ranks second.

    Roughly 21,000 Iowans now develop cancer in Iowa annually, according to the Iowa Cancer Registry. That’s more than twice as many cancers as occurred in 1973 in a state where the current population — 3.2 million — is a mere 11% higher than it was 50 years ago.

    Democrats in the state House and Senate proposed legislation this year to increase funding for health studies aimed at definitively identifying the sources of malignancies.

    “We need to make this statement, given the rising cancer rates here and our number two rate in the country,” said Sen. Janice Weiner (D-Iowa), who proposed a bill in January to invest $5.25 million for research on pediatric and other cancers to stem what she called “Iowa’s cancer crisis.”

    “I have colleagues on the House side who have filed similar legislation that has bipartisan support,” she said.

    “So I’m hoping it will move forward. We have a serious problem in Iowa. We owe it to Iowans not to whitewash anything — but to approach it scientifically and get to the bottom of this, wherever research and clinical tests lead us.”

    Charlton did not respond to an interview request for this article.

    Originally published by The New Lede

    This report, co-published with Circle of Blue, is part of an ongoing series looking at how changing agricultural policies are affecting human and environmental health. 

    Keith Schneider, a former New York Times national correspondent, is the senior editor for Circle of Blue. He has reported on the contest for energy, food and water in the era of climate change from six continents.

    The New Lede is a news initiative specializing in coverage of environmental issues that are critical to the health and well-being of people everywhere.

    “© [Article Date] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

    SHARE THIS ARTICLE
               

    Author

    CDM Staff

    The mission at Creative Destruction Media is to be the catalyst for the "process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one."
  • Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    3 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Ndndn

    Jab

    D3F1ANT

    Did a high rate of Iowans get the jab?

    pepperspapa

    Fauci science "telling the little people to give up booze". How about case histories of those that have cancer. Are they drinkers? Are they living in or around farms? The jabs? Vitamin D levels? In other words real research without a protective class(s). But their in luck some wingnut Senator wants to throw more money at it. Put her in charge of selecting the research team. She will get to the bottom of this pit if she lives many live times.

    FOLLOW US

  • Subscribe to our evening newsletter to stay informed during these challenging times!!

    ×