• [stock-market-ticker symbols="AAPL;MSFT;GOOG;HPQ;^SPX;^DJI;LSE:BAG" stockExchange="NYSENasdaq" width"100%" palette="financial-light"]

    Why Trump 2020 Repudiates the 2017 Women’s March

    November 18, 2020
    No Comments

    The majority of US women, representing 56% of women voters cast their ballot for Donald Trump in the 2020 general election. All stop. 

    In this general election, Trump gained more Black, Latino, Muslim and other minority women’s votes. He is the first US President to gain a lot of minority voters since the great President Ronald Reagan. Trump never pandered to BLM or Antifa.

    The reason women voted for Trump is they are more concerned about substantial issues and equal rights, equal pay, and equal justice are part of that. Trump made it clear America needs its middle-class and jobs back and it wasn’t just rhetoric. Trump brought back the jobs. 

    On the flipside, according to the Women’s March organizers, even though the white woman demographic contributed over 70% in attendance and support for the plethora of non-women’s right issues, their racial identity made them part of the problem and white women were told to take a back seat to minorities. Her words to women marchers were in line with “Sit down and shut the fuck up because you’re white privileged and part of the problem.”

    This got to the point that Teresa Shook, the woman who originated the idea for the march disassociated from the movement at the time because organizers were racist and xenophobic.

    Using this as a starting point, it will be easy to understand how almost half the US population was mobilized like a weapon of war against the other half.

    Out of all the 2017 Women’s march participants there primarily for women’s rights, only 38.1% considered equality their motivation and 11.72% thought equal pay for equal work was important. I’ll get back to this study later but the initial takeaway is most of the issues surrounding the women’s movement are secondary or tertiary the way the Women’s march was organized.

    This is where the 2017 Women’s march went off the rails. It was never about equality or rights. Instead, it was the first iteration of the 2020 boots on the ground insurgency fired up by the whole nation Information Operation that came back to the US from Ukraine.

    The Women’s March helped refine the approach that would be taken and the gleaned data was drilled down to which news and media platforms would be used over the next 4 years to destroy the Trump narrative and was buttressed by the Intel community and agency coup begun in earnest

    by the ODNI James Clapper.

    Before you write this off as obvious, the following shows how DNC operatives clumsily used the Women’s March as the starting point to paint a US President as a racist and white supremacist opened the ground for BLM to start protests that became the riots in 2020. Before 2016, Donald Trump was well known for his support of the black community by civil rights leaders. 

    While the march was billed as the largest civil protest in US history, in reality, it was the first iteration of a boots on the ground approach Antifa-BLM insurrection. That’s why Ilhan Omar can dare to insult the half of the country and presidency indecently and not fear rebuke.

    The 2017 Women’s March brought these headlines which show how desperate organizers were to create a racial divide. “He will not divide us!”

    The heroic sounding headlines helped manage a staged event. The first white supremacist group of 2017 had a black man and two black women supporting it.

    Watching the video closely you see the young black women in the background acting as placeholders until the “white supremacist banner” is opened. The young man of color is holding the left side of the banner which is the Ukrainian national flag.

    If you look closely at Lebeouf and the young nazi in the foreground, they’re playing off each other and smiling because it’s a good show. 

    The hat (shown below) the young US-OUNb (Ukrainian Nationalist- American Diaspora) is wearing was worn by Stepan Bandera’s Ukrainian OUNb when they were active, willing participants in WWII’s Holocausts. The OUNb manned most of Europe’s death camps.

    The photo on the right shows the same hat worn in Ukraine today when they celebrate the Waffen SS Galician in Lviv, Ukraine.

    The event in the video was the lead into the Antifa-BLM riots the US faces today. It shouldn’t be surprising that the DNC’s jackboots are modeled on Hitler’s Brownshirts. After all, the 3rd Reich were socialist-antifascists as well. 

    According to Wikipedia, In his 1936 Hitler: A Biography, German historian Konrad Heiden remarked that within the SA ranks, there were "large numbers of Communists and Social Democrats" and that "many of the storm troops were called 'beefsteaks' – brown outside and red within The influx of non-Nazis into the Sturmabteilung membership was so prevalent that SA men would joke that "In our storm troop there are three Nazis, but we shall soon have spewed them out

    However, historian Thomas Friedrich reports that the repeated efforts by the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) to appeal to the working-class backgrounds of the SA were "doomed to failure", because most SA men were focused on the cult of Hitler and destroying the "Marxist enemy."

    Hitler’s socialism was at odds with Lenin and Marx communism. 

    At this point the rollout of the Ukrainian IO on to Donald Trump was in its infant stages. The stage had been set to throw the Russian collusion and Russian hacking narrative at him through the Women’s March within a week of the idea first being pressed in mainstream media.

    How did the Women’s March get co-opted before it was even in the planning stages is the question that needs to be answered. 

    Was there Ukrainian involvement?

    Why Trump 2020 Repudiates the 2017 Women’s March

    James Clapper’s January 2017 ODNI made it possible to organize 3 million activists around Alexandra Chalupa and push the Treasonous Trump narrative spun by Chalupa starting in October 2016.

    In fact, in one comprehensive study done on the Women’s March only 43% of participants were there to support equality. At the same time, 63% were there to protest Donald Trump’s Russian Influence campaign that beat Hillary Clinton at the polls within 20 days of the faked evidence 

    Crowdstrike pushed in James Clapper’s ODNI report. This pushed the Chalupa’s TreasonousTrump hashtag into visibility.

    As early as October 20, 2016, Chalupa was looking for a vehicle which the Women’s March provided to kick off the US version of the whole nation IO that worked so well in Ukraine. The image on the right shows the #NastyWoman hashtag and the theme was developed by October 26th

    Why Trump 2020 Repudiates the 2017 Women’s March

    Another major non-equality issue was the overlap into what was dubbed Trump’s Muslim ban. Donald Trump banned asylum for fighters coming out of northern Syria through Turkey. 

    Why Trump 2020 Repudiates the 2017 Women’s March

    Chalupa’s OUNb-Ukrainian Americans work closely on regime change in Syria with groups linked to ISIS like the Syrian-American Medical Society. In late 2016, John Brennan was trying to get asylum for ISIS fighters in the US. Like his Ukrainian fighters, they congregated around what have become Antifa-BLM strongholds.

    The 2017 Women’s March protesters were literally demanding to allow ISIS terrorist fighters into the USA. This 2016 Sofrep article was written by one of the Green Beret’s who trained them in Syria.

    US SPECIAL FORCES SABOTAGE WHITE HOUSE POLICY GONE DISASTROUSLY WRONG WITH COVERT OPS IN SYRIA “Nobody believes in it. You’re like, ‘Fuck this,’” a former Green Beret says of America’s covert and clandestine programs to train and arm Syrian militias. “Everyone on the ground knows they are jihadis. No one on the ground believes in this mission or this effort, and they know they are just training the next generation of jihadis, so they are sabotaging it by saying, ‘Fuck it, who cares?’”

    Ilhan Omar is raging today and calling Trump supporters KKK because she knows the DNC needs the free flow of terrorist fighters into the US to fill in the ranks on the streets.

    The DNC and its OUNb-Ukrainian American component have brought what the DoD has labeled Netwar to the United States. Don’t let the soft titling fool you. After over $1 billion in damaged cities and attempted theft of the 2020 election, the reality of what happens when a part of the electorate programmed by Strategic communicators through news and social media should be hitting home.

    The DoD defines Netwar as war waged by a segment of society against foreign countries or on other segments of a society containing all the facets a military war would. While this starts on internet networks, netwar distills down to boots on the ground violence to force changes the side waging it wants. 

    CD Media will be defining the still ongoing IO while opening up what this means to you directly as we go forward. Going forward if this is allowed to continue will make the last 4 years seem like paddy-cake.

    America has to get back to a place where laws protect all the people, including the officers charged with protecting and serving the people while prosecuting those who would harm any of us.

    Under 22 USC, section 2656, "terrorism" is defined as premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents usually intended to influence an audience when done to intimidate or coerce a government or its people in furtherance of political or social objectives."

    Groups are targeted with the resulting effects being destructive or disruptive enough to generate fear potentially comparable to that from a traditional act of terrorism, even if initiated by criminals with no political motive. 

    Violence by politically motivated international, or sub-national groups, or clandestine agents who threaten or cause violence and fear in order to influence an audience or cause a government to change its policies is terrorism. 

    Lastly, terrorism is violence or actions with an avowed goal of undermining the public’s morale and its confidence in economic and political institutions.

    This apt description is why Antifa-BLM should be taken off the street and why investigations into election fraud need to be thorough. 

    After we open up the DNC Netwar and how the IO programming was used, the first steps to closing it down can be addressed.



    George Eliason

    George Eliason is an American journalist living and working in Donbass. He provided some of the earliest news coverage at the beginning of the Ukraine conflict and some coverage from the frontline in the Ukrainian civil war as well as analysis of the conflict. Eliason was noted by the New York Times, 60 Minutes, and the Heritage Foundation's Foreign Policy Magazine as the earliest and a primary source of information about Ukrainegate, Obamagate, and the coup against Donald Trump. He has been interviewed by the New York Times, RT, Press TV, and the BBC. His articles on the Intel community and agency overstep has been noted by Project Censored as the second most important stories with national signifigancein 2018 for going beyond WikiLeaks coverage on the dangers private Intelligence companies present to national security and world peace. Eliason has been been published in Modern Diplomacy, the Security Assistance Monitor, Washingtonsblog Consortium News, OpedNews, and Zero Hedge among many other publications.
  • Subscribe
    Notify of

    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments


  • Subscribe to our evening newsletter to stay informed during these challenging times!!