Every time Dominion Voting Systems has been in the news over its 18 year history, words like lie and stonewall appear directly after. With this kind of legacy, the big question of the next few months will be how this company was ever allowed near a state or federal election.
After Joe Oltmann broke the story of Dominion Voting Systems security chief Eric Coomer vowing to destroy the 2020 election, CD Media followed up with Coomer’s June 2nd FaceBook posting of AntiFa material that was his reaction to German Pirate Party instructions.
My first question to Eric Coomer’s boss John Poulos is whether or not he encourages employees like Coomer to exercise their political rights and firebomb police stations like the Pirate Party’s AntiFa has been doing for the last 6 months?
The big lie that keeps cropping up in support of Dominion is the company is US-based. According to Dominion, no foreign national directly or indirectly owns or controls the company. The problem with this statement is even though Dominion Voting Systems headquarters are in Toronto, Ontario, and Denver, they seem to keep neglecting to mention the independent British Commonwealth nation of Barbados, where one vertical of the holding company is domiciled.
Like all things Dominion, they divide the truth so it’s not as easy to find unless it’s printed on a court docket. The company is divided into three corporations -- Dominion Voting Systems International Corporation, Dominion Voting Systems Corporation and Dominion Voting Systems Inc.
While trying to excoriate attorney Sydney Powell, Dominion’s John Poulos asks voters to trust internet fact-checkers or his own word while continuing to lie about his company.
Dominion systems are certified in 28 states. While the company disagrees with the decision and rationale offered by the State of Texas for not certifying our system, we recognize there are different standards for different states. The Dominion system has successfully undergone U.S. federal government certification. Importantly, no other review of this system has ever identified concerns about the system being inefficient or insecure.- John Poulos
Smartmatic’s Philippine lawsuit began due to their partnership with Dominion and the defective technology Dominion provided during the 2010 Philippine elections. Dominion illegally withheld the source code which was supposed to be reviewed 90 days before the election.
The 2010 problems Dominion caused mirror the 2020 election with regards to voting tabulation.
According to ABSCBN News, The complaint further held Dominion liable for a defect in the technology, with the latter's software allegedly failing to correctly read and record the paper ballot during a test of the automated voting system conducted shortly before the election.
"This relates to the problems encountered one week before the Elections in May 2010, where the software provided by Dominion was producing inaccurate results of the testing and sealing ballots," Smartmatic's Cesar Flores said.
According to Philippines Commission on Elections (Comelec) Chairman Sixto Brillantes-The Philippines is stuck because of the case in Delaware, and the fight (between Dominion and Smartmatic) in Puerto Rico and Mongolia. Brillantes said, "They're only interested in one thing -- money."
The 2020 election makes it clear Dominion has never cleaned up its act. The way this company does business screams to a pedestrian “investigate me” and yet here we are. Because of the grip this company and others like it have on the SoS (National Association of Secretaries of State), they can get away with lying to Congress. How can any election they are involved in be trusted regardless of the outcome?
Throughout Dominion’s history the one thing Poulos’ company makes patently clear is it has no problem taking countries hostage through their electoral system.
Subscribe to our evening newsletter to stay informed during these challenging times!!
CD Media - making up false and incendiary stories to grab a few eyeballs and fire up a whackadoodle base of useful idiots since 2019 (or whenever this POS “media organization” came into being).
Truth, who do you trust? NYT which denied the Holocaust and still hasn't apologized? CNN, MSNBC, cbs, Fox, abc all who called Rudy crazy weeks before the election with credible evidence on the former v p and his son's dealings, now these same media organizations are reporting on it and showing concerns. Where were all of them before? Let's see how this plays out before casting stones. Take care.
You IO guys need to sharpen up a little. Are you saying the 2010 Phillippine election didn't go down like the election commissioner said? Or that the court didn't report Dominion as 3 entities? You support Coomer's call to destroy the country as we know it? Or Dominion throwing him into the center of the mix mucking up the election? Which questions apply to you?
Dominion system is the most evil machine involving the stolen votes and that one machine containing everyone’s personal information and altered to make sure Biden won. Germany had a back up server with all results. No one listened and I was already getting threats. But I’m proud of Trump standing up and questioning the election and those machines are altered and the servers are in a different country via the other company. We have to speak up and fight for our votes. And people tell everyone to stop calling the race card. White people have rights to
@George Eliason Eliason - are you going to take the lead of newsmax and offer up a full retraction of the bullshit tales you are weaving that come at the expense of companies and individuals for fear of defamation litigation? More likely you will press forward with this crap knowing that this little corner of the internet is so far off anyone’s radar that nobody will take note of the garbage you are spewing.
Obscurity has its benefits for you.
Specifically, what are you challenging? I expect this is where the deafening sound of crickets come into play. It's a nice move but all people need to do is hit the links to the source material.
OK George - here are some specifics I challenge.
1 - this whole Eric Coomer muckraking. Honestly, this is simply despicable. Either offer real evidence (not this garbage “I infiltrated an antifa conference call and heard a guy named Eric say...”) or move on. It’s just PATHETIC.
2 - the whole conflation of Dominion and Smartmatic to sow confusion and try to tie somehow to a dead Chavez. The companies are competitors that - at one time shared a licensing agreement. That licensing agreement is at the center of the articles and lawsuits you reference above. Which is it? Doesn’t matter to you. Just a way to spread misinformation.
3 - statements like this “The 2010 problems Dominion caused mirror the 2020 election with regards to voting tabulation”. Which 2020 problem exactly? Antrim? The one which was identified straight away, addressed in real time, tied to specific USER error, and further validated by the full and transparent hand recount? You mean that 2020 issue - right?
4 - sections like this “According to Philippines Commission on Elections (Comelec) Chairman Sixto Brillantes-The Philippines is stuck because of the case in Delaware, and the fight (between Dominion and Smartmatic) in Puerto Rico and Mongolia. Brillantes said, “They’re only interested in one thing — money.” which are intended to make it look like Dominion is embroiled in election fraud in multiple locales. The reality here is that this is very much the licensing fight between Dominion and Smartmatic. Details that don’t matter when you are trying to stoke the base and spread garbage.
There’s some specifics for ya.
1. I didn't rely on Oltmann. Here's the article with the proof. I wrote it. https://creativedestructionmedia.com/investigations/2020/11/15/eric-coomer-dominion-voting-ties-to-german-antifa-is-foreign-interference/
2.I never claimed those ties. Both are dirty as hell.
3.The same problem of counting votes in the Phillippines and Swing states exist today. Then it was tech and software. Today it is software.
4.Talk to the Philippines. The election's chief did that interview.
So, What specifically is your problem with the article?
Let’s keep it simple....#3 “today it is software.” I say again - simply false and ask for your proof. Are you speaking of Antrim? That was, is, and has proven to be a human error configuring the system to read the ballots. It was identified, corrected, and validated through audit of the ballots themselves. If the software is configured to read a given ballot and the ballot has been modified the software must be reconfigured to read the updated ballot. It was not. It was wrong. It was identified. It was corrected.
@Goerge - let’s go back to item #1 for a moment. I wonder, do your baseless and destructive allegations on this front now cease since Dr Croomer has dropped a defamation suit on the key parties involved? Does it upset you that CD Media was not named in said suit because of the pure obscurity mentioned in earlier comments? Or, perhaps that obscurity in this little dark corner of the interwebs is your happiest of moments so that you can safely spew the vile without fearing of having to self-fund a meaningful defense. Either way - this is perhaps the sickest aspect of these baseless stories - the reality that you and others have sought to destroy an individual to prop up your own little bit of fiction.