CD Media
Politics

Democrats Formally Try To Delay Barrett Confirmation

Senate Judiciary Committee’s top Democrat, Senator Feinstein, formally wrote a letter to Chairman Lindsey Graham requesting to delay the October 12th confirmation process. 

Feinstein wrote, “The timeline for consideration of Judge Barrett’s nomination is incompatible with the Senate’s constitutional role. We again urge you to delay consideration of this nomination until after the presidential inauguration. The Senate and the American public deserve a deliberative, thorough process, and this falls far short.”

CDMedia is being de-platformed and obviously too effective! We need your support to put more reporters in the field! Help us here! 

She continued, “This timeline is a sharp departure from past practice. Even more, it undercuts the Senate’s ability to fulfill its advice and consent role and deprives the American people of a meaningful opportunity to gauge the nominee and her record for themselves.”

But for Graham, he believes there is ample time to confirm her to the court, especially because Barrett already received a bipartisan vote to serve on the 7th Circuit Court. Graham said, “The question for the country is, is [Judge Barrett] ready to be promoted? I think the answer is yes. I think she’s done everything anybody could hope a nominee for the Supreme Court would do in their life. I think [Judge Barrett] is one of the most qualified people to ever be nominated to the Supreme Court.

Barrett has unanimous support from the Senate Republicans, who have touted her judicial record. Furthermore, she has already turned in her 65-page questionnaire on her professional and legal career, as well as hundreds of pages of her legal writings and opinions. 

Democrats have argued that while it is an election year, the confirmation process should wait until after the election. Biden spoke about it at the debate, saying that the people should decide. But Trump pointed out in the debate that the people did decide, because he is still president. 

Related posts

Trump Addresses Post Office Accusations

Claire Hardwick

Dumb Disingenuous Dem Impeachment Managers Are Dumb

CD Media Staff

Impeachment II: Pelosi Boogaloo, Bill Barr And Rand Paul’s Balancing Acts

Court Anderson

17 comments

Avatar
CharleyC October 1, 2020 at 9:09 pm

The American people don’t need to “gauge” the nominee. We did that when we elected Donald Trump. The Senate’s role is to advise and consent, not delay and obfuscate.

Reply
Avatar
ItsJo October 2, 2020 at 12:02 am

BINGO, CHARLEY!! They know that, but they are STILL going to try to Interfere with Trump’s appointee and try to STOP HER…They are so Corrupt, it is sickening! Too bad, we DON’T have an honest A.G. Barr, who along with Att. Durham is NOT EVEN INVESTIGATING THE ‘CORRUPTION WITHIN THEIR PAST AGENCIES, AND THE LATEST ON THE CIA,s BRENNAN WHOSE REPLACEMENT IS NOW ‘SLOW WALKING ANYTHING THAT WOULD SHOW THE REAL CORRUPTION OF HER CIA, AS SHE WAS PART OF THE ‘BRENNAN’S UK SHENNAIGANS WHEN CRISTOPHER STEELE, PUT HIS (AND BRENNAN’S/Obama’s/HILLARY’S) FAKE RUSSIAN DOSSIER TOGETHER, BUT NOW COMEY, AND THE REST OF THESE CRIMINALS, ‘HAVE GOTTEN AMNESIA.”

Reply
Avatar
Dr.Hyperion October 1, 2020 at 9:30 pm

The democrats are shameless and the sorest of sore losers in the history of losing. They should be better at it now, wouldn’t you think? Oh well, they’ll get another opportunity to be graceful losers again in 30 some odd days. I’m guessing they won’t take that opportunity to become more gracious.

Reply
Avatar
Jerry Rockwell October 1, 2020 at 9:46 pm

No where has the American people decided who would be the Supreme Court nominee. We elect presidents to do that. And we elect senators to make the decision. No one has ever in my 72 years on earth asked me who I would nominate. Nor should they, I voted for a very intelligent President to make the nomination. Now Feinstein do you damned job. If you would like, just bring it to a vote and don’t say anything. We the AMERICAN PEOPLE already know how you and every democrat on the committee will vote, so just vote “NO” and quit acting like we are stupid.

Reply
Avatar
J. Guidry October 1, 2020 at 10:15 pm

The hearing should proceed on Oct. 12, with all present, both sides of the aisle. Give each Senator an alloted amount of time to speak or question Judge Barrett. Then shut them off when they go for the grandstanding the dems will surely try. Just shut ’em up and move on to the next Senator.
The dems won’t like it, but then they don’t like anything about this nomination anyway.
Or, better yet, hold no hearing, go to floor vote and swear her in immediately following the vote.
Let ’em scream at the sky. Go on with the people’s business. Post haste.

Reply
Avatar
JulianusRex October 1, 2020 at 10:57 pm

This fossil wasn’t bright enough to realize she was employing a Chinese spy for many years yet she presumes to sit in judgement of a truly brilliant nominee. Age limits! Term limits!

Reply
Avatar
ItsJo October 1, 2020 at 11:55 pm

Correct post JulianusRex, as Feinstein recently “tried to float HER praises about ‘How Much China is doing to and for their people….WHAT? Killing them with their deliberately made CCP Virus, to “thin out the many millions of people they kill regularly and caused this World Wide Pandemic especially Against America, that Xi would NOT want to see Potus Trump reelected, as his pal Soros has the SAME AGENDA, with his investments in “WuXi Pharma Tech that has a laboratory in Wuhan, WHERE this Virus was Made!” Obama gave them $3.6 Billion(or Million) to Continue being the “World’s Medicine Chest” as they dominate the markets-and see Trump as the obstacle to their world dominance as they STEAL our Intelligence Property, our Ideas and ‘pay OUR Politicos, like Feinstein, etal. to “LOOK THE OTHER WAY, AND JUST TAKE THEIR KICK BACKS FROM CCP.”

To your post, it’s true, and she and her husband have “Made MILLIONS FROM CHINA FOR A LONG, LONG TIME.”

Reply
Avatar
ItsJo October 1, 2020 at 11:46 pm

This is merely Another Scheme by Sen. Feinstein-JUST as it was when she brought up a Fake Witness-Prof. Ford, who supposedly ‘wrote Diane a letter she held onto for 3 months, then tried to “SPRING it on the hearing using an “11th Hour Hail Mary Pass’-that Diane FUMBLED SO BADLY.”

She’s trying a corrupt Move AGAIN, but when the POTUS Trump and his party is the Senate, then HE gets to appoint whomever he wants-the Dems KNOW they are trying to STOP THIS JUDGE, and they are such ‘lying hypocrites, who would do EXACTLY the same thing right now-IF they were in charge.’ They insult our intelligence with their “slanted rules and lies, and SINCE so many Dimwit Democrats have ALREADY SAID “I WILL NOT MEET WITH HER, THEN SO BE IT.”

The Republicans need to act as ONE COHESIVE PARTY and stand behind who WE THE PEOPLE voted in as POTUS….they should be doing their JOBS, and NOT ‘PLAYING TO THE CAMERAS AND BEING ‘PRIMA DONNAS, WHO JUST WORRY ABOUT THEMSELVES AND NOT THIS NATION’S VERY SURVIVAL.” Get OFF your Asses RINO’S and quit “Pandering to the Corrupt Democrat Party, as you show your OWN WEAKNESS and your People will NOT BE HAPPY THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO APPEAL TO….They know MORE than you, who Rep. Them!
And we ALL KNOW WHO THE “HOLDOUTS, RINO’S AND PRIMA DONNA’S ARE..GET A CLUE!!
DO SOMETHING FOR THE REPUBLIC FOR A CHANGE AND “NOT YOUR LIFETIME CAREER, FEEDING AT THE TROUGH.”

Reply
Avatar
Me October 1, 2020 at 11:52 pm

Democrats: Please postpone considering this nomination until after the inauguration; because, if we win the Senate and White House, we plan to kill the filibuster, pack the court, and pack the Senate with DC and Puerto Rico statehood among other power grabbing moves and begin the radical transformation of the country in earnest. A conservative majority on the Supreme Court might slow us down or even stop us; so, just let us rope a dope the electorate with our “sincere” Constitutional concerns.

Reply
Avatar
old farta October 1, 2020 at 11:54 pm

Lengthy bio, What office is Claire Hardwick running for???

Reply
Avatar
suibne October 2, 2020 at 12:00 am

every lie, every phony assertion, every ridiculous stunt the left is pulling out of their axxes now are really about this nominee. They are finished for the next twenty years if she the seat on the high court she deserves to get. and they know it. ARREST, TRY AND EXECTUTE NANCY PELOSI AND HER SOC8IALIST TRAITOR BUDDIES.

Reply
Avatar
Ads October 2, 2020 at 12:49 am

Feinstein, you’re nothing more than a sour faced evil money grubbing woman with nothing better to do than enrich yourself with ill gotten funds.

Reply
Avatar
D3F1ANT October 2, 2020 at 1:02 am

The GOP will allow the Dems to hijack the confirmation…Republicans are their own worst enemy.

Reply
Avatar
twoody October 2, 2020 at 1:56 am

The hearings do not begin until Oct. 12 to give the Judiciary Committee time to asses Judge Barrett’s qualifications. Since the Democrats do not even want to meet with Judge Barrett let’s get the hearings started now.

Reply
Avatar
Ender October 2, 2020 at 2:51 am

Guess they forgot how they didn’t let the republicans participate in their impeachment circus. They weren’t allowed to ask questions or do anything. So, avoid the circus, sit down, shut up and cast your no vote (no amount of questioning will change their vote) and move on with the republicans voting yes.

Reply
Avatar
Richard Johnson October 2, 2020 at 3:14 am

Trump getting a third SC justice confirmed is the crowning achievement of a successful first term.

Reply
Avatar
Rumplestiltskin October 2, 2020 at 1:05 pm

It is time for No-so-fine-stein to retire, or die of a heart attack. IE: She needs to go…….

Reply

Leave a Comment