• [stock-market-ticker symbols="AAPL;MSFT;GOOG;HPQ;^SPX;^DJI;LSE:BAG" stockExchange="NYSENasdaq" width"100%" palette="financial-light"]

    The West Didn't Become Rich Because Of Slavery But In Spite Of It

    October 11, 2022
    Roman Collared Slaves

    Please Follow us on GabMindsTelegramRumbleGab TVGETTRTruth Social 

    Reprinted with permission Mises Institute Lipton Matthews

    The blockbuster film The Woman King has resurrected the myth that slavery furnishes wealth. While irate critics argue that the film downplays the fact that the Dahomey Empire derived its wealth from slavery, however, this observation wrongly conflates political success with human flourishing. The state and individual are two distinct entities, and as such the objectives of individuals are often incompatible with those of the state.

    In Africa, the slave trade enriched merchants and political elites at the expense of people who were enslaved, nor did ordinary Africans emerge as winners from the transatlantic slave trade. Noting that states like Asante and Dahomey became affluent as a result of the slave trade is really a commentary on the growing reach of African elites rather than an indication of improved living standards for ordinary people.

    During the apex of the slave trade, the trade in slaves was monopolized by the Dahomean king. After being procured for trade, slaves were sold at the coast by royal traders. Opportunities released by the slave trade led to the establishment of a thriving merchant class that consisted primarily of people who were connected to the state bureaucracy. Inevitably, the slave trade was another vehicle for elites to accumulate wealth rather than an agent of mass-based flourishing.

    Throughout history, many societies have engaged in slavery, yet slavery never led to an economic revolution in any preindustrial society. But, unfortunately, people continue to conflate the enrichment of the national treasury with individual advancement. As a mercantilist tool, slavery boosted the national treasury, though it was unsuccessful at engendering widespread prosperity.

    ‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!‘

    Media rhetoric might promote the narrative that slavery leads to economic prosperity, but this claim is merely folklore and easily disproven by Dahomey’s abysmal economic track record. Today, Dahomey, now called Benin, has a measly per capita income of $1,428, according to the World Bank. Dahomey was one of the most prominent African players in the slave trade, so if the slave trade is a potential route to wealth, why is she so poor today?

    Notwithstanding the potency of mainstream rhetoric that slavery is linked to economic prosperity, studies consistently show a negative relationship between slavery and development. Neither should we believe the claptrap that the wealth of Europe was hinged on slavery. European countries were already modernizing before partaking in the slave trade and Atlantic slavery.

    Moreover, the success of the Atlantic economy should be attributable to the institutional and human capital advantage of European economies. Europeans built trading companies, insurance facilities, and other innovations to oversee the business of exploitation. Hence people who contend that slavery built Europe are misidentifying the channels that led to growth.

    Slavery is a classic example of what economist Douglas North calls a closed social order. Under such systems opportunities are limited and privileges are distributed to a select few. Slave societies naturally disenfranchise slaves and people who are too poor to acquire chattel. Slaves are rarely exposed to education or given the tools to succeed and because most policies favor the slaveholding aristocracy, nonslaveholders are placed at a disadvantage.

    Furthermore, slave societies are unlikely to invest in mass literacy, civic institutions, and the industrial sector. Since, economic elites derive most of their wealth from slavery, they are unmotivated to finance innovations in other sectors of the economy and due to their political clout slaveholders can block reforms that deprive them of benefits. The negative link between slavery and social outcomes has been a persistent fact in economic research, contrary to mainstream propaganda.

    One study surveying Brazil finds that even thirty years after abolition, municipalities with a history of large-scale slavery still had worse social outcomes, measured by literacy rates, wages, and availability of public resources. Over the long-term research also reveals that in Brazil the intensity of historical slavery predicts higher levels of income and educational equality and worse public institutions. In Columbia, research paints an equally horrendous picture of the effects of slavery. A 2012 study conducted by Daron Acemoglu and coauthors asserts that the “historical presence of slavery is associated with increased poverty and reduced school enrollment, vaccination coverage, and public good provision.”

    On the other hand, in nineteenth-century America, the US North was more productive and innovative than the slave-producing South. Yet despite the importance of slavery to the South’s economy, after abolition, the South continued to thrive, thus suggesting that slavery is not a necessary condition for economic progress. Indeed, the claim that slavery ushered in a period of economic dynamism in the West or anywhere else is inaccurate. Furthermore, it must be noted that non-Western economies were more reliant on slavery

    The abolition of slavery in places like Ibadan and among the Igbo people severely disrupted society. Unlike Western countries that were involved in slavery, these societies had less scope for economic diversification. Their economies were intimately related to slavery and few industries existed that could replace the institution of slavery. So, although slavery did not make them rich, they obtained a larger share of wealth from the institution than their Western peers.

    In the current climate of hysteria, intellectual gatekeepers frequently parrot the claim that slavery is an engine of prosperity, but this notion is unsupported by rigorous empirical tests and repeating it will never make it true.

    Lipton Matthews is a researcher, business analyst, and contributor to Merion WestThe FederalistAmerican Thinker, Intellectual Takeout, mises.org, and Imaginative Conservative



    CDM Staff

    The mission at Creative Destruction Media is to be the catalyst for the "process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one."
  • Subscribe
    Notify of

    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Phil Inman

    First substantive write up on slavery and economics I've run into. I suspect will be helpful to generally refute 1619 B.S. Thanks to Lipton and all.


    The purpose of slaves was never economic. The purpose was power.

    Diana Barahona

    The global capitalist class resorts to shouting people down and censorship whenever you get close to what they are. Anyone remember when a Swedish Youtuber (Pewdiepie) was censored because he said, "Take that, Nazi," as he shot a Nazi in a vdieogame? The reason Youtube didn't want Pewdiepie to say the word, Nazi, is because the Nazis actually won WWII and took over the United States of America. (Look up Operation Highjump and Project Omega).

    This is also the reason they created Antifa. They created a group of mind-controlled thugs who go around calling people fascist so that no decent person would want to call the globalists fascists (which is what they are) out of fear of being associated with Antifa. It's genius.

    Racism is another subject that only certain people are allowed to talk about. The global capitalists really are racists, but they're racist against human beings. They have been tampering with the genetics of humans on a massive scale---extracting sperm and eggs from parents, adding alien DNA, and implanting the adulterated embryos in mothers without their knowledge. That's why almost everyone's eyes are now slanted---humans didn't used to have widely-spaced slanted eyes (or Lori Lightfoot eyes in a minority of cases). The goal, according to some, was to connect humans to a grey-alien hive mind. However, I don't understand how they could have tampered with the genes of millions of humans without realizing that the plan wasn't working. Yes, everyone's eyes look much different, but the hive-mind idea seems to have been a colossal failure.

    Now the third forbidden subject: slavery. That one the globalists are extremely sensitive about, and it is not because of what the ruling elites did in the past. Rather, it's because of what they have been doing since WWII ended---abducting millions of humans and enslaving them off-planet. Watch Penny Bradley for the details of that. https://inscribedonthebelievingmind.blog/2022/10/11/penny-bradley/


  • Subscribe to our evening newsletter to stay informed during these challenging times!!