Should you be concerned? What is the evidence?

Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, GETTR, Truth Social, Twitter 

Many oncologists have reported, in an anecdotal way, an increase in the number and aggressiveness of certain cancers since the rollout of the COVID so-called “vaccines” and around the world the number of people dying from all causes (Excess Deaths) has risen dramatically for some hitherto unexplained reason. So, it is proper to pose the question: “Do the COVID-19 “vaccines” trigger cancer?

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!‘  

If the answer to this question is “yes”…..it would be an end of these gene-based therapies, a further collapse of confidence and mistrust in government health care advice, carry massive commercial and litigation issues and a destruction of many political and bureaucratic careers which have promoted, as a matter of record, these drugs in an unqualified way. So, you can imagine, even if important evidence did exist there would be monumental resistance to any claimed association between the injections and cancer. The evidence would need to be clear, overwhelming and incontrovertible for any admission of harm. But the chances of this in the near term are essentially zero due to the very nature of the development of cancer in that, unlike the widely accepted cardiovascular adverse effects of heart attack, stroke etc which have a temporal relationship with the administration of the injections, cancers develop over the longer term and most have an unexplained aetiology.

Let’s start with the government’s position on the safety of the COVID gene-based “vaccines”. From the outset our government declared, without the necessary evidence, that the COVID injections were “safe and effective” without qualification. We know that to be untrue. The only question is that was this a noble lie, a purposeful deception or just incompetence. You can bet there is next to no chance any link between the injections and cancer will be admitted during the tenure of the current crop of “health experts”, bureaucrats and politicians no matter what evidence emerges. Forget it. There is just too much at stake.

There is also no incentive to investigate the possible link between the COVID injections and cancer. Vaccine manufacturers have got away with conducting absolute minimal safety testing on their products because they have been allowed to do so by the drug regulators and in many jurisdictions there is effective legal indemnity from prosecution and it is, of course, notoriously difficult and expensive for any individual to prove harm in a court of law. These vaccines have produced a river of gold for many companies. But many people are waking up to the fact that vaccines should not be considered “safe” by default and the necessary longer term safety data for these products has simply not been generated.

Where does that leave us? Upon what evidence should we rely to form an opinion?

In the absence of any large scale, well designed data mining and/or prospective studies we are left with:

1. Anecdotal impressions of highly credentialed oncologists
2. Considered plausible pharmacological/immunological mechanisms of action, and
3. Adverse drug reaction reports.

Let’s take each of these in turn and please forgive me for repeating information which has been included in my previous Substacks - large numbers of my readers have only become subscribers in the last few months and may have missed this information.

IMPRESSIONS OF HIGHLY CREDENTIALED ONCOLOGISTS

I have taken particular notice of the recent comments of Prof. Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St. George’s University of London and widely recognised as a world authority in cancer treatment. Prof. Dalgleish was reported (CLICK HERE) in Trial Site News on 28 Nov. as saying: ““…there are many unnecessary antibodies formed inside the body following COVID-19 boosters. He called this “antibody-dependent enhancement.”   “The boosters do not cause the body to make IgG1 and IgG3, which are neutralizing antibodies, instead, they switch to IgG4 antibodies which are less effective in combating infection or disease. These IgG4 antibodies suppress the T-cell response which causes a suppression in the fast-acting innate immune response. This, according to the hypothesis, increases the chance of cancer relapse in people after getting COVID-19 boosters.”

and

“In the interview, Dalgleish also talked about mRNA vaccines. He expressed his frustration over the use of the SV40 promoter in mRNA vaccines and explained that it is an oncogenic promoter used for developing cancer in mice.”

Prof. Dalgleish is not alone in raising concern about the possible link between the injections and cancer.

CONSIDERED PLAUSIBLE PHARMACOLOGICAL /IMMUNOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF ACTION

Apart from sounding the alarm about his personal observations in dealing with cancer patients, Prof. Dalgleish has postulated a plausible mechanism of action for the possible link between the injections and cancer (above). But another world renown scientist, Kevin McKernan, has also suggested a plausible mechanism for the development of cancers. I refer my readers to my Substack of 6 Nov. (CLICK HERE) to view in which I said: “According to McKernan, Pfizer apparently hid the presence of the SV40 promoter sequence (not the whole SV40 virus) in the plasmid DNA used to make mRNA from regulatory authorities.  SV40 sequence promotes the production of mRNA.  The drug regulators have tried to cover up this issue by using a straw man argument and saying that the Covid vaccines do not contain the SV40 virus – which is correct.  But they do contain the potentially the dangerous shorter SV40 promoter segment.” 

ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTS

The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine adverse event reporting system database (VAERS) is now reporting a 1433 times increase in cancer cases associated with COVID-19 vaccination.

Some have rebutted that such a statistic is misleading because so many COVID vaccinations were given that this figure cannot be relied upon. But a closer look at the CDC’s own VAERS data suggests this criticism is unjustified.

Based on the number of adverse events related to cancer alone, the data shows there have been 1433 times as many cancer cases related to Covid-19 vaccination than there have been related to flu vaccination per 100,000 doses administered. I refer my readers to my Substack of 25 Sept (CLICK HERE) to view and I reproduce the key graphic below which tells the story. I am relying here on CDC data.

CONCLUSIONS

There exists substantial circumstantial evidence for a possible link between the COVID-19 “vaccines” and the development or triggering of cancers. The onus of proof for the safety of the vaccines rests with the manufacturers and, in my opinion, we should assume there is an undefined but significant cancer risk with these gene based therapies unless proven otherwise. From a medical ethical point of view and a drug regulatory point of view, the public needs to be made aware of this potential risk, especially for those individuals recovering from cancer, in keeping with established informed consent guidelines. Given the safety signals, it is the government’s responsibility to investigate the possible oncogenic effect of the injections from adverse drug reaction data and to demand that the manufacturers release specific information which may have been previously unavailable and to mount specific independent well designed studies to assess the cancer risk as a matter of urgency.

• Hungary Prepares New Legislation To Address Immigration Crisis
• Orbán Warns EU Migration Plan Will Lead To Acts Of Terrorism, Crime, And Gaza-Style Mini-Ghettoes
• Zelensky Rebuked By Romanian Parliament During State Visit