Courts Repeatedly Refused To Consider Trump’s Election Claims On The Merits

March 11, 2021
1 Comment
We Are Living In The Ruins Of Our Civilization
Giovanni Pauolo Panini – Fantasy View with the Pantheon and other Monuments of Ancient Rome

Please Follow us on Gab, Parler, Minds, Telegram, Rumble

On Monday, without comment, the Supreme Court ended the last of the 2020 election cases, rejecting Trump v. Wisconsin Election Commission in a one-line order. It was a quiet ending to a tumultuous election season, but like a football game with a contentious call at the end, the debate over who really won will likely go on much longer.

The courts have always served as a pressure-relief valve on our internal disagreements. From the battle with an unscrupulous car dealer to a nasty divorce that requires discernment over how to split everything from the antique Corvette to the kids, wise judges can help to bring peace and healing. Surely, for a nation reeling after a tempestuous presidential election filled with strange occurrences, the courts were needed to bring us together.

We needed the steady hand of impartial jurists. Most of all, the losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn’t the outcome they wanted. That did not happen after Nov. 3. Despite a stack of cases that worked their way through the legal system, we remain bitterly divided...

To read more visit The Federalist.

Keep The Truth Bombs Coming From CDMedia! Donate!  

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Author

CDM Staff

The mission at Creative Destruction Media is to be the catalyst for the "process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one."
  • guest

    1 Comment
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Huapakechi

    How can it be a "fair shake" when the judges refuse to look at the evidence?

    Subscribe to our evening newsletter to stay informed during these challenging times!!