CD Media

Courts Repeatedly Refused To Consider Trump’s Election Claims On The Merits

We Are Living In The Ruins Of Our Civilization
Giovanni Pauolo Panini – Fantasy View with the Pantheon and other Monuments of Ancient Rome

Please Follow us on Gab, Parler, Minds, Telegram, Rumble

On Monday, without comment, the Supreme Court ended the last of the 2020 election cases, rejecting Trump v. Wisconsin Election Commission in a one-line order. It was a quiet ending to a tumultuous election season, but like a football game with a contentious call at the end, the debate over who really won will likely go on much longer.

The courts have always served as a pressure-relief valve on our internal disagreements. From the battle with an unscrupulous car dealer to a nasty divorce that requires discernment over how to split everything from the antique Corvette to the kids, wise judges can help to bring peace and healing. Surely, for a nation reeling after a tempestuous presidential election filled with strange occurrences, the courts were needed to bring us together.

We needed the steady hand of impartial jurists. Most of all, the losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn’t the outcome they wanted. That did not happen after Nov. 3. Despite a stack of cases that worked their way through the legal system, we remain bitterly divided…

To read more visit The Federalist.

Keep The Truth Bombs Coming From CDMedia! Donate!  

Related posts

Trump Considers Flynn Pardon

CD Media Staff

War Room Pandemic Morning Show Recap 3/12

CD Media Staff

Grassroots Fury At Kemp Bubbles Up In County GOP Meetings Around Georgia

CD Media Staff

1 comment

Huapakechi November 16, 2022 at 9:29 pm

How can it be a “fair shake” when the judges refuse to look at the evidence?


Leave a Comment

Subscribe to our evening newsletter to stay informed during these challenging times!!