It was upsetting to hear that my Aussie friends, who recently had Covid, are still feeling residual effects, as if they are suffering from a cold, along with tiredness and lethargy. Having also had Covid back in May, I can sympathize with those four weeks, post virus, when I felt less than 100%. However, after taking several meds and supplements, recommended to me by friends and doctors, today, I feel better than I did pre-Covid.
Excited to share those remedies with my friends, as they visit in the next month, it was daunting to hear that they will not be permitted to return to Australia with those very same things which not only helped me recover but actually returned my vitality to that of half my age!
It’s hard to believe what the reasoning is that one’s homeland would discourage supplements and suppress other remedies which hundreds of thousands have claimed returned them to their full health and, further, restored them to their maximum energy capacity. Of course, it goes without saying that the whole issue of healthcare is a personal one, and decisions should be made only after individuals have come to their own conclusions once they have been well-informed.
So where does government fit into that process? Well, it doesn’t! Government was never set up to outsource our thinking and decision making! It was also never intended to assume that citizens are incapable of doing their own research and figuring out what they believe is best for their bodies and their lives. And it certainly was never intended to mandate one medical treatment course which, if not heeded, would result in immediate job termination!
In the case of Australia, there is simply no justification for the government to overstep its boundaries in their attempt to control their citizens who, up until now, have been able to access whatever medications they chose for themselves. By limiting what is available or even legal, they are sending a message to more than 27 million people that they, the government, gets to decide what you can and cannot take in order to feel well.
According to the Australian website www.tga.gov.au, Covid-19 treatment is approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) only after it has undergone pre-application, application, evaluation, decision, registration and monitoring. In the website, there is a special section concerning the administration of the dreaded Ivermectin as a preventative treatment for Covid. It states that “Ivermectin has not received regulatory approval in Australia or by other comparable countries for use as an anti-viral treatment and that the consensus view of major regulators and in top-tier international medical journals is that the evidence for the clinical efficacy and safety of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of Covid-19 is not strong at this stage, requiring more evidence.”
Surely, there is no political consideration in that statement nor would the massive profits of pharmaceutical companies, who have a personal interest in pushing their “one” vaccine treatment plan, come into play as governments, for some unknown reason, fall into line with big pharma. Nothing to see there!
One Australian nurse reports that her government’s suggestions have included the use of Panadol (another name for Tylenol), isolation, staying home until you can’t breathe and then finally making the trip to the hospital.
Although many of us have taken Ivermectin as a therapeutic treatment, during Covid, apparently bureaucrats feel that there are not enough successful anecdotal accounts in order to give a resounding approval that the drug is both effective and cheap with almost no side effects.
It conveniently seems to have gone unnoticed by the Australian government that “Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have both undergone extensive safety testing by over 30 clinical studies of a high quality and given glowing reports on both efficacy and safety in numerous countries. In addition, it’s had a record of use for up to 60 years by millions of people, using these drugs worldwide, with an excellent safety record.” www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov., (Covid Update: What is the truth, Russell L. Blaylock, M.D., 4/22/22)
Yet, the TGA has given the green light to Remdesivir, a drug which, after having undergone clinical studies, has been found to be an ineffective antiviral drug and one which, according to WHO (World Health Organization) guidelines is advising against its use, citing that “there is currently no evidence that it improves survival or the need for ventilation,” per www.bmj.com, (Who Guideline Development Group advises against use of remdesivir for Covid-19).
In fact, according to Paul Marik, M.D., a well-known proponent of Ivermectin, he claims that “four randomized controlled trials demonstrate that Remdesivir prolongs hospital length of stay, increases complications, increases renal failure and does not improve patient outcome. (www.councilforhealth.org, Dr. Paul Marik – FLCCC’s founding member details lawsuit against his employer, 11/15/21)
So, can anyone provide a reasonable answer as to why government bureaucrats think that they know better than well-trained, professional doctors, many of whom have been silenced or threatened if they dare publicly state their objections to recommended Covid treatments being promoted by heavily invested pharmaceutical companies and governments?
A quick read of the above article by Dr. Russell L. Blaylock lays out the many renowned experts, in their fields, who have been warned against speaking against the status quo.
It is simply unconscionable that governments, or their surrogates, have seized the God-given right of people to purchase or take whatever treatments they choose. Ironically, the U.S. government is not forbidding drug addicts to continue ingesting poisons into their systems. Heck, they’re even facilitating the addicted by providing crack pipe kits, per the Washington Free Beacon which alleged “a grant for the kits from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was providing drug paraphernalia.” (www.thenationaldesk.com, Investigation confirms presence of crack pipes in government funded safe smoking kits, 5/12/22)
What are we to make of this? It seems that government is in favor of anything that will hasten the demise of individuals but against anything that has provided a good track record of expected recovery. There doesn’t seem to be any other way to interpret all of the above facts.
In conclusion, Australians, as well as citizens of every other nation on the face of the earth, need to be free in order to make informed decisions as to what goes into their body, their ability to make those choices and to reject the notion that their lives are part of a governmental pact wherein they must first seek approval on how to conduct their courses of action.
Governmental interference into the personal lives of people is not only insulting, but it is the ultimate invasion of privacy on matters of life and death which are reserved only for the individual and their Creator. Every freedom-loving person must value their right to life enough to fight back against an intolerable invasion which has no place in humanity, because if they don’t, they will have ended up relinquishing life and liberty to those who have no interest in preserving them.
Subscribe to our evening newsletter to stay informed during these challenging times!!