Following up on the July 9, 2020 CD Media breaking story: Ukrainian MEP Releases Further Biden Tapes…JOE CONSPIRED WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENT AGAINST TRUMP it’s clear, then Vice President Joe Biden conspired with Ukraine’s President Petr Poroshenko, the DNC, and Alexandra Chalupa’s Diaspora to overthrow the 2016 Presidential election.
Andriy Derkach, a member of Kyiv’s parliament, released audio recordings clearly showing the former Vice President’s participation.
According to Derkach’s taped phone call between the two leaders:
Poroshenko: it was a bad idea to take Yanukovych's advisor Manfort to Trump's team: “And one more thing, just as a joke. We have published documents of the former Party of Regions. As I understand it, one of Mr Trump's key advisors, Paul Manafort, resigned today ... As for me, it was a bad idea to take Yanukovych's advisor to Trump's team. "
There’s been a lot of speculation about the release of the Party of Region’s black book that caused Paul Manafort to resign from the Trump campaign and ultimately cost him his freedom. Main Stream media pushed the idea from the beginning that it was an anti-corruption effort on the part of Ukrainians.
But what if it was something insidious? What if it was a combined effort to derail the candidacy of Donald Trump in 2016? Let’s take the implications a step further and spell out the truth.
Ukraine’s efforts were not only to derail Donald Trump but to shape American foreign and domestic policymaking US sure tax dollars gave them an endless supply of weaponry and financial support even though it is commonly reported that large sums from those support packages disappear.
On August 18, 2016, CD Media’s L. Todd Wood broke the story with the Washington Times questioning the authenticity of the black book documents supplied Ukraine.
From Wood’s story;”These documents were provided to detectives of National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) from a Ukrainian member of parliament who acquired them from “a source.”
Shockingly, the document published by the newspaper, supposedly showing the page of a ledger detailing covert payments, was not part of these original documents provided to NABU. The Times’ article insists that the document was released by NABU, but that appears to be untrue. NABU by law has not been able to release any documents to the public.”
The documents Poroshenko said “we published" were put together by Serhiy Leshchenko of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) in Kiev. Leshchenko works closely with the US embassy in Kiev, is an MP in the Ukrainian Rada and was convicted for wrongfully interfering in the 2016 US election for his trouble.On August 19, 2016, after the Washington Times interview, Sergiy Leshchenko wrote on FaceBook "after such a blow, Trump will not recover." He deleted the post after the 2016 election.
What Todd Wood caught on to was the fact the release was illegal in Ukraine. When you couple that with the persecution of Manafort as a central core of the DNC opposition research effort, Joe Biden is an accessory after the fact of the theft of documents to destroy a political opponent of his party while colluding with a foreign country.
Richard Nixon was impeached and removed from office for less.
This story ties both the Biden-Burisma scandal and the DNC-Alexandra Chalupa effort to destroy both the candidacy and the presidency of Donald Trump.
According to CD Media’s taped Biden’s conversation with Poroshenko:
In the second tape, Biden calls Trump ‘the dog who caught the car’, who has no idea of what to do, and Biden and Poroshenko have ‘a real chance of making him a hero’. In other words, damaging the incoming administration and making them look bad… The third tape shows Biden discussing getting Poroshenko’s children into University of Pennsylvania, as payback for helping the Obama Administration in their Ukrainian anti-Trump endeavors…
After this conversation was over, why did Barrack Obama and Joe Biden protect Ukraine, military funding to Ukraine, promote Ukraine’s interests, and persecute Donald Trump after he won the election?
Let’s put the shoe on the other foot for a moment to get our bearings.
When asked about Donald Trump’s statement that he is the highest law enforcement official in the US, Politifact went to a Constitutional scholar to mollify the impact of Trump’s statement.
Johnson is not alone in addressing the law enforcement title using Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution.
That section includes a wide-ranging description of presidential duties and says the president should deliver a State of the Union address, is able to recommend legislation, can call Congress into session and "shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed."
In other words, the holder of the nation’s highest office is tasked with executing (i.e. enforcing) the nation’s laws. So in a literal sense, Trump could be described as the chief law enforcement officer.
"It’s a novel identifier for the president, but it’s not technically incorrect," said Kimberly Wehle, a law professor at the University of Baltimore and author of the book "How to Read the Constitution and Why."But experts say the title is a loaded one since the "law enforcement" phrasing implies Trump is something like the police chief over all of America. That clashes with the spirit of the Constitution.
According to Ukrainian sources, Joe Biden’s problems go even deeper than actively working in a criminal conspiracy against Donald Trump. This was a cooperative effort involving the US State Department through the US Embassy in Ukraine, and the DNC.
In a Financial Times story, "Ukraine's leaders campaign against 'pro-Putin' Trump," Leshchenko obtained the material Paul Manafort was investigated from the director of NABU, Artem Sytnik while working with representatives of the DNC. Remember the 2017 Politico interview with Alexandra Chalupa?
According to ABC News, “Here we have a conviction of U.S. meddling, and you just viewed that as not being significant and you just dismissed it?” Rep. Gordon Perry, R-Penn., asked Marie Yovanovitch, the former ambassador to Ukraine who was removed after Giuliani and others launched what she and her colleagues called a “smear campaign” against her.
Yovanovitch said it was “our view” that the case against Leshchenko wasn't “credible.”
What she meant was there is no law in Ukraine against interfering in foreign elections. Yovanovitch chose to support the crimes in Ukraine against her own country and made clear her first allegiance is to Petr Poroshenko’s Ukraine, not the people of America.
Leshchenko was very active in developing the Trump Russia saga in 2016 and was a primary source for Christopher Steele. In fact, Sergei Leshchenko was one of Christopher Steele's main sources . He passed incriminating data to a research firm about the actions of Trump's associate Paul Manafort.
Fusion GPS started work on the Steele Dossier right after the Trump Tower meeting. When did Leshchenko start working for them?
According to the Hill, in a series of “Hi Honey” emails Nellie Ohr sent to her federal prosecutor husband raised the question of Hillary Clinton-funded opposition research being funneled into the Justice Department during the 2016 election because Ohr worked for Fusion GPS developing opposition research against Donald Trump and his campaign chairman, Paul Manafort.
What set Leschchenko on this course to find the black book that took Paul Manafort down and before the election led Leschchenko to believe he personally gave the DNC’s Hillary Clinton a free ride into the White House?
According to an article in the Telegraph, immediately after publishing the black book, Leshchenko was able to purchase a luxury apartment in Kiev valued at $300,000.
When the Financial Times interviewed Leshchenko on August 28, 2016 he stated he is focusing on a new perceived pro-Russian threat to Ukraine: US presidential candidate Donald Trump.
What’s more important is the same article gave a cross-section of post-Maidan leadership’s views and why. In 2016, Donald Trump removed providing arms to Ukraine from the Republican Party platform.
∙ Adrian Karatnycky, a senior fellow at Washington’s Atlantic Council think-tank said it was “no wonder that some key Ukrainian political figures are getting involved to an unprecedented degree in trying to weaken the Trump bandwagon”.
∙ Arseny Yatseniuk, the former prime minister, warned that Mr. Trump had “challenged the very values of the free world”. Arsen Avakov, interior minister, called the candidate’s statement the “diagnosis of a dangerous marginal
∙ Natalie Jaresko tweeted John McCain “Please assure us you disagree with statement on Crimea/Ukraine. Trump’s lies not position of free world, inc Rep party.”
Alexandra Chalupa and the DNC cannot walk away from soliciting criminal actions in a foreign country and colluding with Ukraine to destroy a presidential candidate during a contested national election.
According to Interfax Ukraine, the Senate report on Burisma is just the tip of the iceberg.
Mykola Zlochevsky, former Ecology Minister and Burisma Group owner contacted U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry and suggested they share the profits of the Ukrainian gas producer Burisma Group.
British investigative journalist Oliver claimed that at about the same time (in March 2014) that Biden's son Hunter received an offer to take the position of board member of Burisma. Biden Jr. was appointed Member of the Board of Burisma on May 12, 2014. In addition to him, Alexander Kwasniewski, Alan Apter and Devon Archer were appointed.
In total, according to our data from the report of the financial investigation unit of Latvia, in favor of two shell companies, as well as Alexander Kwasniewski, Alan Apter, Devon Archer and Hunter Biden, Burisma paid at least $16.5 million.
What this means is more key figures from the Obama administration are under investigation and the evidence is already there.
How many more quid pro quos Joe? How many other times did Biden and the Obama administration sell out America for the DNC and Ukrainian political agendas?
These are questions that will take time to sort out. But we can be sure of one thing.
You’re going to look great in that suit Joe! It’s the special made DNC orange jumpsuit you’ve been asking for.
Subscribe to our evening newsletter to stay informed during these challenging times!!
None of this will be covered by the regular media or the social media platforms, which are for Biden.
They publicly say so, as do celebrities, media personalities, academics.
Trump's campaign is against the media rather than against Joe Biden, who appears to have largely disappeared, and not making regular campaign appearances, although he has been seen outside the basement recently.
It would be impressive if, for once, all this evidence of Democrat criminality was actually used to prosecute someone. We get investigations up the yin yang...and they produce proof of criminal activity...and nothing happens. Well...unless the perps are Republicans. Justice should be applied equally to everyone. Just because the guilty parties are named Biden doesn't mean they should get a free pass. Obama, Clinton and their henchmen should face the music like anyone else. It's sad that Barr disagrees.
This will be totally ignored by the Democrat Party's “Joseph Goebbels Media Complex” as this is all just...misinformation!
"But experts say the title is a loaded one since the “law enforcement” phrasing implies Trump is something like the police chief over all of America. That clashes with the spirit of the Constitution."
Name the experts who would say something this stupid.
If the author can't find the experts, the author must have concocted it their self. If this is so, please explain how you transition from enforcing laws to police chief OVER ALL OF AMERICA. It is an extreme stretch to conclude that the President of the US, would be responsible for enforcing local, city and state laws, which your statement implies. Moronic at best.